IVUS helps with disease assessment, assists with decisions during intervention and helps confirm treatment results. Obtain answers from within, without a question with Philips IVUS for your deep venous procedures. As an adjunct to conventional angiographic interventions, the Visions PV .035 digital IVUS catheter evaluates vascular morphology in blood vessels and provides cross-sectional imaging of these vessels. With a 90 cm length and 60 mm max imaging diameter for 0.035” guide wire interventional procedures, the device aids in peripheral artery disease and venous disease diagnosis and guides clinicians toward the correct therapy for the patient’s unique needs.
An additional benefit of IVUS is that you can potentially minimise the amount of radiation and contrast the patient is exposed to while making that diagnosis. We need to consider the increased radiation costs to the patient and medical team when evaluating diagnostic technologies. "
Dr. Paul Gagne, MD, FACS, RVT
The Vascular Experts, Darien, CT
Changed plan from no treatment to stent placement
Changed number of stent planned
Changed plan from no treatment to other intervention
Changed plan from treatment to no treatment
The Core M2 is an easy-to-use, small footprint, digital IVUS imaging system, designed for peripheral vascular procedures and operable directly from the sterile field. The Core M2 vascular system is used for the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of vascular morphology in the coronary arteries and vessels of the peripheral vasculature. It is also indicated as an adjunct to conventional angiographic procedures to provide an image of vessel lumen and wall structures.
Philips IntraSight interventional applications platform is where IVUS imaging, physiology, co-registration2 and software come together to facilitate optimal patient care. IntraSight offers a comprehensive suite of clinically proven3-7 modalities, such as iFR/FFR, IVUS and co-registration2 to simplify complex interventions, speed routine procedures and provide improved patient care.
Solutions for peripheral arterial interventions (PAD) procedures offered by Philips image-guided therapy.
Learn more Disclaimer Product availability is subject to country regulatory clearance. Please contact your local sales representative to check the availability in your country. References 1. Gagne PG, Tahara RW, Fastabend CP, et al. Venography versus intravascular ultrasound for diagnosing and treating iliofemoral vein obstruction. J Vasc Surg:Venous and Lym Dis. 2017;5:678-87. 2. Co-registration tools available within IntraSight 7 configuration via SyncVision. 3. Davies JE, et al. DEFINE-FLAIR: A Multi- Centre, Prospective, International, Randomized, Blinded Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Cost Efficiencies of iFR and FFR Decision-Making for Physiological Guided Coronary Revascularization. New England Journal of Medicine, epub March 18, 2017. 4. Gotberg M, et al., Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Versus Fractional Flow Reserve Guided Intervention (IFR-SWEDEHEART): A Multicenter, Prospective, Registry-Based Randomized Clinical Trial. New England Journal of Medicine, epub March 18, 2017. 5. Patel M. “Cost-effectiveness of instantaneous wave-Free Ratio (iFR) compared with Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) to guide coronary revascularization decision-making.” Late-breaking Clinical Trial presentation at ACC on March 10, 2018. 6. Maehara A, Matsumura M, Ali ZA, Mintz GS, Stone GW. IVUS-guided versus OCT-guided coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2017;10:1487-1503. 7. Choi K, et al. Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Long-Term Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Complex Procedures. JACC: Cardivascular Interventions. Mar 2019, 4281; DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.01.227.
Co-registration tools available within IntraSight 7 configuration via SyncVision.
You are about to visit a Philips global content page
Continue